The recent suggestion of a 90-hour work week by Larsen & Toubro (L&T) chairman SN Subrahmanyan has sparked widespread debate across social media and corporate circles. The proposal, reportedly discussed during an internal meeting, has drawn mixed reactions, with many questioning its feasibility and implications on employees’ work-life balance. The topic gained further traction after veteran investor Vijay Kedia added his voice to the conversation with a sharp dose of sarcasm.
Vijay Kedia, a well-known figure in the investing world, took to X (formerly Twitter) to share his perspective on the matter. In his post, Kedia highlighted that a 90-hour work week might indeed be “helpful” but not for employees. According to him, such rigorous work schedules would primarily benefit employers, enabling them to reap higher profits while placing enormous pressure on their workforce. His remarks struck a chord with many online, sparking further discussions about corporate culture and employee well-being.
Kedia’s sarcastic post specifically pointed out how such hard work could line the pockets of company leaders. “Boss just bought a Lamborghini,” he quipped, implying that relentless employee efforts often translate into extravagant perks for the top brass. He further suggested that if employees continue working under such demanding schedules, it wouldn’t be surprising if the bosses could afford another luxury car by next year. His comment cleverly highlighted the unequal distribution of rewards in many corporate settings.
The post has since gone viral, with users praising Kedia for his blunt yet humorous take on the issue. While some agreed wholeheartedly with his criticism, others used the opportunity to reflect on the broader implications of work culture in modern organizations. The 90-hour work week proposal has particularly alarmed advocates of employee mental health, who warn against the dangers of burnout and the long-term negative effects of such schedules.
The debate over work-life balance and the exploitation of employees continues to gain momentum, with Kedia’s remarks adding fuel to the fire. As more voices join the discussion, the proposal has become a lightning rod for conversations about the future of work, the ethics of corporate management, and the need for fair practices that prioritize employee well-being alongside profitability.
